Ethics Wall Mart Essay

1. What financial imp bite do you think the lawsuit could potenti each(prenominal)y hasten on Wal-Mart? Ans. Wal-Mart is the biggest or largest retail store in the field. Naturally, their earning and employees atomic number 18 besides more compared to other corporate. The lawsuit against the company was not the company contract when they were facing other legal issues such(prenominal) as the child advertize and employ workforcet of illegal immigrants. Six women who say women were treated lower than the young-begetting(prenominal) even if they acquired agree posts qualification and experience filed the lawsuit. The six women who filed the case against Wal-Mart are not only asking the company pay for the unfair motion tho also asking them to pay back and compensate for all 1.6 female employees against whom Wal-Mart disunited. This would cost the company a fortune because these 1.6 female workers were authorize to forward motions, salary increment, trainings and other suc h things. To compensate or reimburse that very much amount for that much workers would surely stupefy a huge and major impact on the companys financial side. The other manner in which this lawsuit could affect the companys financial position would be through the transaction or sales. Other thing is the genius and goodwill of the company.2. What are the major lesson complaints of the females suing Wal-Mart? Do you believe these moral complaints are justified? Why? Ans. Major Complaints Difference in the promotion scheme between male and female employees, The lower payment of fight and salaries to female employees even they were at same level with male employees, short distri furtherion of management training among the male and female employees, Male administer a better job assignment compared to women even they were equally qualified, be and experienced.Yes, I believe these complaints are justifiable because we can see from either blame that women were not treated fairly and equally. It wasnt that women lacked in anything or that they were unwilling to work, it was because they were woman. We can very well compete with men and in some cases may even prove better than them but it is act like this what is pulling the power of women fine-tune. The six women who sued Wal-Mart didnt sue for null they had physical proof and evidences of the discrimination laid upon them. Some of the evidences were found in the employees records where by Richard Drogin, a statistical expert found out that employee at Wal-Mart was divided into two principal(prenominal) groups, hourly employees who occupied the lower levels and paying(a) managers who occupied the higher levels.Compensation increases from one level to the next. In 2001, stipendiary managers founder about $50,000 a year while hourly employees made $18,000. Drogin found out that not only 65% of hourly employees were women but also 33% of salaried managers constituted women. So at both the point women ear ned less than man. When we also look upon the experience level, an reasonable woman was far more experienced than an average man because women worked or stuck there for longer than men. Women despite having other responsibilities like raising a kid or managing the home, they feed more where they work that is why they have less turnover rates. So this adds up to another reason why the lawsuit was appropriate or justifiable.3. What factors do you think might government note for the discrepancies the Drogin report uncovered? Ans. The company took the women employees for granted. At first the founder surface-to-air missile Walton wanted equality but after passing away the onus value was lost. The management took the women employees for granted so didnt feel the need to promote them.4. What, if anything, do you think Wal-Mart should do to correct these discrepancies? Should the company instal an assentient action promotion program for female employees? If so, what should this progr am be like? Ans. 1) Work DiscriminationHere I am talking about the actual work or labor work. Women at Wal-Mart seem to be working at par with men but still they are not paid at par. To compensate for the womens losses they could reduce their work time or they could allocate women to areas where stripped-d knowledge energy is required. For example they could work at displaying of items, as a cashier, and such places where not much of hard labor is required.2) Facility such as Day CareWal-Mart is one of the biggest retail all over the world and they have lots of property they own. If they established some Day bang centre for their employees especially the female employees then those employees who have kids can have their kids in those centre and work carefree in the store. The centre could be near the store and they could also charge some amount as charge but this could not only benefit the workers but also the company for could avoid unnecessary absenteeism3) Womens AssociationAn association called the Womens Association can be formed in every retail store so that female employees can come together to hold forth their issues and forward suggestions and feedback. Such programs do not have to disturb their convention work time, it could be conducted once in every month or whenever major issues arise.4) Equal RespectAt Wal-Marts women were mostly looked down and not given the respect they deserve. A woman may be somebodys mother, wife or sister. Men at Wal-Mart drop to see that and they criticized women of their looks, their past, future and their purpose in life. So therefore women should be given respect and treated equally. Yes definitely the company should institute an affirmative action in order to promote program for the female employees. From my point of view, since the company is based in the United States they should associate their program with the Statue of intimacy. That statue denotes the power of women and it signifies the rightly to freedo m for all the U.S citizens. The title or the main theme of such program could be Liberty for Women . Whereby they could stress the freedom to speak, advance and employment especially for the female workers. They could relate women to some famed figure such as the Mother Teresa or simply their own mom. On this particular day they could give all the female employees a one-day holiday and let them embrace themselves. The company should however grant fiscal compensation for this day. This way women employee could proudly say they work at Wal-Mart and dedicate completely to their work and avoid complaining. Some of the points they could keep in instinct while pursuing such program could be as follows * The right and responsibilities of women* The importance of women* The success of women till now* The potential and ability of women* The sacrifices women make in every aspect of life* And maybe life without women5. Do you think the women deserve to realise the lawsuit?Ans. Yes I feel t hat they should win the lawsuit. The grounds on which they are fighting is right. As everyone is equal in todays world, the demand for female employees to have their salaries equal to that of men is justified. The company can frame new policies for salary, wages and promotion, which doesnt discriminate men and women employees. So in the future both genders have equal opportunities and are paid equally.